|
|
Anatomy of a Grant Application
Page Contents:
- A Letter of Intent (LOI) - some competitions may not request an LOI
- The Complete Grant Application:
- Summary Information
- Brief summary of research proposal
- Research proposal
- Budget and justification
- Letters of Support
- Curriculum Vitae
- External Reviewers
- Application Checklist
- Letter of Intent (LOI) / Notice of Intent (NOI) / Letter of Inquiry (LOI)
- terminology may differ among sponsors
- requirements are typically the same across all sponsors that request an LOI
- An LOI may be requested prior to the full application submission
- It often follows an agency’s Request for Applications (aka Call for Proposals) by 1-2 months
- The LOI provides the agency with formal notification that you will be submitting a full application by the deadline
- Typically includes:
- names of Principal Investigator (PI) and Co-applicants
- affiliations of PI and co-applicants: names of organizations or institutions
- your project title
- a short summary of your proposed project
- this allows the agency to screen out applicants who don’t meet the eligibility requirements
- Principal Applicant:
- Name, address, phone, fax, email
- Organization with which you are affiliated
- Project:
- Title
- Keywords
- Primary location of research
- Certificates Required:
- Ethics approval
- Biohazard/bio-safety approval
- Amount Requested:
- Budget summary (no details required here)
- Project Team Information - Co-applicants:
- Name, address, phone, fax, email
- Organization and department
- Signature
- Who Will Administer the Funds - Financial Officer:
- Name, position
- Organization, address, phone
- Fax, email address
- Project Signatories
- Depending on the agency to which you apply, signatures are needed from:
- Principal applicant
- Co-applicants
- Head of department
- Executive authority of host organization where research will be conducted
- Your application will not be accepted if there are any missing signatures!
- Overview and Relevance of the Project:
- What is the problem to be solved and is the project relevant?
- Indicate a knowledge gap and rationale for why your project is needed
- How will the research be done? Indicate the general approach that would be taken to answer your research questions: identify your methods and research plan
- Why is the research important? How is your project innovative, novel and appropriate for this particular funding program? Identify the relevance of your project and state its significance
- What is the expected impact of your project? Who will benefit? Describe outcomes as tangible measures of success that can be used during and after project completion
- This is your sales pitch - make it relevant!
- A key component of your research application - many reviewers will only read this
- Detailed Research Proposal
- Describe the rationale and significance of your project
- Review existing knowledge and describe knowledge gaps
- Clearly state your project goal and objectives
- Describe the research design, methods and data analysis
- Provide complete and appropriate references
- Reviewers want to see that your work is scientifically sound and that you know exactly what you are doing
- Project Work Plan
- Describe your work plan using a time chart or clear text
- You are more likely to be funded if you can demonstrate that you know what you are doing and when you are doing it
- Reviewers want to know what are you doing, when you are doing it, and who is responsible for doing it
- Knowledge Transfer Framework
- How will Results be Disseminated?
- Will the project results have an impact?
- How will results be communicated and disseminated to those who should use them? (e.g., policy makers, stakeholders, the public)
- What steps will you take to disseminate your results?
- To whom will those results be disseminated?
- Review committees will need to be convinced that your communication and dissemination plans are appropriate
- State exactly what your plans are and how they are appropriate
- Project Budget -
- Typically includes:
- personnel salaries and benefits (e.g., research assistants, trainees, interviewers - include names if possible)
- supplies and expenses
- permanent equipment, database access
- services (e.g., photography, computing)
- travel to present findings or for collaboration
- knowledge transfer plan
- Review committees are evaluating whether you are including items that are appropriate for the project activities
- The budget is a direct result of your outlined methods
- Be as detailed as possible - the more the better!
- Salary support for the principal applicant is generally not permitted except if they are trainees or research associates on the grant or a decision maker
- Do not include infrastructure costs (space rental, heat, light, furniture, regular telephone service, secretarial support, etc)
- Budget Justification
- Justify each expense for which you require funding support
- Provide adequate and persuasive justification for each item
- Use narrative form
- Reviewers should be convinced that you truly do need the items listed in your budget
- Include all sources of partner contributions
- May include space, equipment and supplies, and volunteered time
- Specify provision of cash or in-kind support
- Include matching funds, if applicable
- If equipment is permitted:
- Prove that you need the equipment
- Demonstrate that you have tried accessing the equipment elsewhere
- Attach supplier quotes
- If consultants will be contracted:
- Provide contact information for the key supporters of your project
- Key supporters may be universities, agencies, or community partners
- Describe their involvement to date? – prior involvement is a good indicator of a strong linkage that will last through project completion
- Describe their expected role in your project. What are they bringing to your project (e.g., expertise, resources)?
- Each supporter must provide a letter of support describing what they are committed to offering your project
- A letter from your employer indicating their willingness to participate is often recommended
- Request letters of support early
- It is recommended to request letters at least three weeks prior to your deadline, preferably six weeks before deadline
- Reviewers should be convinced that you have the support necessary to carry out the proposed project
- Do not submit the same support (form) letter for each of your partners or collaborators
- Provide biographical sketches of your research team: the curriculum vitae
- The principal applicant and co-applicants must complete this section
- Full name, title, institution or organization
- Educational background: institution, degree/diploma, certificate/qualification, year conferred, field of study
- Research, professional experience, publications
- Visit BCEOHRN’s Mentorship Program site: How to Write a Curriculum Vitae
- Demonstrate that your team members collectively have the necessary skills to conduct the proposed project activities
- Funds requested and funds currently held
- List any funding applications that are pending or under review
- List all funding you have been granted and currently hold (i.e. active grants)
- Most significant contributions
- List contributions you have made during your career that you feel are significant and have had an impact. These could include:
- awards or recognition for research conducted
- research published
- presentations delivered
- teaching or program curricula developed
- You may be asked to provide the names of 2-3 external reviewers
- They should have the expertise to critically evaluate your application
- The agency may or may not use reviewers you have recommended
- Reviewers must be impartial
- Avoid conflict of interest
- Some funding sponsors will offer a checklist to assist applicants
- Print and post this checklist
- Check ‘away’ dates for those from whom you need signatures
- Submit the Letter of Intent by the posted deadline
- Request Letters of Support at least three weeks before the posted deadline
- Distribute your draft proposal for review by colleagues
- Make revisions, carefully review every question and submit by the posted deadline!
Need assistance? Contact Dr. Tanya Wahbe, Research Capacity Development Officer.
Last updated April 27, 2009
|
|